patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Plymouth-Canton Aims for 2013 Bond, Closure of Central Middle School

Plymouth-Canton Community Schools looks to close antiquated school building while offering improvements to district's remaining buildings.

 

If Plymouth-Canton Community Schools has its way, voters in the district could hit the polls in May 2013 to decide whether to accept $117 million school bond proposal — and the closing of a historic middle school in Plymouth.

The bond, if approved, could include closing aging Central Middle School, which administrators say would be more cost-effective than renovating the building to implement more modern amenities. 

Rather than building a new middle school, however, the district would look to spend about $28 million to improve and expand its existing middle schools to take in the additional students.

District identifies needs for improvement

The bond also would cover other building improvements, technology upgrades, network renovations and replacing outdated buses and district vehicles.

Jeanne Farina, assistant superintendent for instructional services, said classroom upgrades would provide students with a "21st-century" learning environment.

With the proposed bond, funds would be used to provide laptops or tablets for teachers, document cameras, portable digital recording carts, interactive projectors  and other high-tech upgrades across Plymouth-Canton's elementary, middle and high schools, Farina said. 

Phil Freeman, assistant superintendent for facilities and operations, said $9.1 million would be used to replace a total of 88 high-mileage buses over six years and 15 aging district vehicles would be replaced over six years for $417,650.

If Central Middle School is closed, Freeman said, there are two options on the table to improve and add to the district's existing middle schools.

One would fill the schools to 89 percent capacity while providing additions to three middle schools and adding the equivalent of about 27 classrooms to the tune of $27.743 million, and the other would offer additions to four middle schools with the equivalent of 33 classrooms, filling the schools to about 86 percent capacity for $25.712 million, Freeman said.

The bond, if approved would be broken into two series, Freeman said, with $53.4 million sold in June 2013, and $63.6 to be sold in late 2015 or early 2016.

No millage increase planned

While the bond would raise $117 million for the school district's improvements, taxpayers won't see an increase as the bond would merely extend their current debt levy of 4.10 mills from an existing millage, Freeman said.

If the bond is approved, Freeman said, taxpayers would pay the same amount in 2013 that they paid in 2012. The tax burden for 2013 would primarily cover the existing millage while beginning to chip away at the new millage. 

By acting now, the district also can take advantage of unusually low interest rates, administrators said.

According to the district's projections, the district's existing millage would be paid off by 2030, and the new millage would be paid off by 2036. During this time, the tax burden would remain the same or decrease from 2012's amount each year.

In tangible figures, the district provided the following table to calculate the daily, monthly and yearly tax burden.

Home Market Value Assessed Value Cost Per Day Cost Per Month 2013-14 Cost
$150,000 $75,000 $0.07 $2.19 $26.25
$200,000 $100,000 $0.10 $2.92 $35
$250,000 $125,000 $0.12 $3.65 $43.75
$300,000 $150,000 $0.14 $4.38 $52.50

Bond talks still preliminary

Talks still are just beginning for the bond proposal, and discussions and projections will continue before school board members agree to put the bond to a public vote.

Administrators provided the following timeline for the millage, leading to its projected May 7, 2013 vote:

  • December: Community receptivity survey
  • December: Informal presentations
  • Dec. 11: Board meeting (update on planning)
  • Jan. 8, 2013: Board meeting — Board informally approves treasury qualifications and scope of projects
  • Jan. 18, 2013: District and bond counsel meet with Department of Treasury
  • Feb. 12, 2013: Board meeting — Board officially adopts resolution to call election (approves formal pre-qualification application)
  • Feb. 26, 2013: Ballot language sent to election coordinator
  • May 7, 2013: Election
Related Topics: 2013 Bond, Millage, PCEP, School Bond, and pccs

Comment_arrow

John

11:03 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Why? What could you possibly do with a giant building that is configured and constructed like Central MS? The building was in poor shape when I went there nearly 15 years ago and I doubt anyone would want to spend the money to renovate it, obviously PCCS isn’t going to. Tear it down and sell the property. Maybe the City would be able to buy the football field and track? Then that could be added to the existing parks and rec programs in Plymouth.

But…I am sure that there will be a long, drawn out fight over the building and property, just like that stupid wall on Union. The school will probably end up the same way, an abandoned, dilapidated eyesore that will be worshiped because it is “History” and cannot be torn down to make way for the future of Plymouth.

Steven S

8:16 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

"We're closing schools, but please give us more money."

Chances are, I'll be voting no.

Reply

Hairman

9:43 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Has the Middle School property been appraised? If so what is the value? When sold where does that $$ go?

Reply

jennifer

10:22 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

What about addressing the situations at the overcrowded and underutilized elementary school buildings? One of the proposals from last years redistricting study was to switch to a lower/upper elementary and modified middle school model & if I recall corectly it had one of the largest finacial savings & desirable building utilizations. Without addressing the issues for children and families at the overcrowded elementary schools, which last years redistricting study was supposed to address but the school board choose to do nothing, it is my opinion that discussion of a bond proposal & decisions regarding use of facilitices is PREMATURE!

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

John McKay

12:18 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Currently, the interest rates for such a bond are lower than they have been in years, which is one of the arguments given for acting now.

I've also heard chatter the past couple of years that Central Middle School would offer a suitable venue for the city's recreation programs, with a swimming pool, athletic fields and gymnasium, and plenty of space for other programs.

Would that use be suitable? I know it's premature to apply a "Visions for Vacancies" for this property, but how would you like to see it used if the school closes?

Reply

Jen

12:58 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I am beyond sad about them thinking to close Central Middle School. It was the High School my mother went to, it was the Middle School I went to and it is the middle school my daughter went to! How can they close such a historic building? We need to maintain Plymouths heritage and try to preserve not only it's old style buildings but also its safe family atmosphere. Modernization is not a good thing because along with it comes the isolationist mentality. Heritage and community are what have made Plymouth a safe place to live all these years. We can't afford to lose any more of it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

P

7:58 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The kids in that school sweat in the summer, and freeze in the winter! I hope and pray that they close it! It is outdated, and it is inappropriate to continue using the building as a school. Sure, schools were not air conditioned when I attended elementary and middle school. Most homes didn't have central air back then either. I prefer to think of children learning in a nice, updated, and air conditioned environment. Unfortunately, my family lives within the Central Middle School District. I am considering moving out of it simply because I do not want my child attending that school. I could care less what they do with the building after they close the school, as long as my child does not have to attend school in it. Let's see those weepy folks who want it to stay open for the sake of sentimentality go sit inside it for a week when it's ninety degrees outside, and one hundred plus degrees inside.

Comment_arrow

Jen

12:45 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

P- I actually did attend it and my daughter not long ago attended it. I know what it's like in there but I also know that some of the districts BEST and brightest teachers are working in that building. I know it's tough but it's also a heck of a great school if you actually CARE about education. I think it also prepares the kids for going to the High School where they will be required to endure temperature, rain, snow and wind just to get from class to class.

Annie

1:36 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

What's more concerning to me as a Plymouth resident and mother of elementary aged school children, but something Plymouth residents don't seem to care about, is that slowly but surely our children are being shuttled to schools outside of the city of Plymouth. Soon enough there will be no more schools within city limits because our "combined district" has been accommodating the growth of the southern and western regions of Canton. You can take your behemoth schools in west Canton any day of the week. My wish would be for Plymouth to have its own school district so that our kids could go to school in neighborhood schools with the neighbor kids they have grown up with, play sports with, parents know each other, strong sense of community ownership, etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lowell Alum

4:07 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Annie,

If Plymouth had its own district without Canton in it even more schools would have to be closed. Canton provides most of the student population. All of Discovery's kids, the vast majority of Pioneer's and East's kids, a good chunk of Central's kids, and even some of West's kids come from south of Joy Road. Of the 15 elementary schools in PCCS, 9 of them get their entire student populations south of Joy Road. Only two (Farrand and Bird) have their whole boundaries north of Joy Road. With the opening of Plymouth Scholars Academy it is my impression that a lot of Plymouth kids are increasingly going there rather than PCCS. Finally if Plymouth were its own district what would you do about high schoolers? All 3 high schools are in Canton Township.

CMD

1:42 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I personally think it is long overdue to close Central Middle School. We cannot keep something going just from sentiment. My kids attended that school and it is very drab, cold in the winter, hot in the spring and fall. The dust and mold are not good for allergies, and I have friends who have taught there and told me about the bad conditions. It is an eyesore from most angles outside also. Is it fair when we all pay taxes and share schools that some in our district attend clean, air-conditioned middle schools, and others attend a dumpy, uncomfortable one? There comes a time when something has out used it's effectiveness. People who did not attend that school in their youth mainly see it as something that takes away from the beauty of the downtown area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DG

10:05 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I did not live here as a youth. It's an eye sore not because of bad architecture but because they blocked up all the windows. I moved to the CITY of Plymouth so my kids could walk to school not be bussed to some tin roofed block structure in the suburbs. Yes the building is run down, that doesn't mean it can be renovated. It's run down because rather than fix it the district choose to spend money building schools that are now at about 60% capacity, and getting worse.

A proper renovation could be something the community and district could be proud of. The building sits at the center of the most densely populated part of the district. Almost every house is the City of Plymouth in within the 1 mile walking distance. If the boundaries weren't so screwed up you could probably fill it with walkers.

Mary H.

2:42 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Why not turn Central Middle School into a Senior Living complex. I'm sure there's a need for it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

P

8:02 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Oh sure, let's melt some seniors in the summer instead of children! Nice idea though, and a nice location for a senior center.

Paul Schulz

8:07 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I'm with Annie, Jen, and Jennifer. There should be no discussion of closing an icon. Central is an important piece of the education our children receive. Just the children walking there from throughout the surrounding neighborhoods, and them building a sense of community, as well as security. I went to school in Livonia, and as I grew up, they closed each neighborhood school, shipping us to areas we weren't familiar with. Destroying tight knit friendships between families. Eliminating the blanket network each neighborhood community has in place, that provides the upbringing children need. I believe it is very detrimental to the children. Plymouth needs its owns school district. Plymouth is not Canton. In fact In some area's its getting ghetto like. I want our kids to enjoy a different upbringing. Plymouth homeowners choose to live here for the higher standards, and quality of life. I think our children deserve the same. I would even support a group discussing starting our own charter school at Central if they decide to close it. Not to discredit Canton, but its poorly planned development and growth has destroyed its former quaintness. Canton no longer shares any of the dynamics Plymouth upholds. There is a downside to diversity. Plymouth is special, lets not let the outside forces change our heritage.

Reply
Comment_arrow

P

8:20 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Paul, Shouldn't those higher standards at least include UPDATING the dinosaur with an appropriate heating and cooling sytem, and desks that don't send children home with cuts? Have you seen the nice leather furniture in the Plymouth Board of Education building lately?

Evan Paputa

8:41 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I went to Central and graduated within the past 10 years. The combination of the staff there, still true today from what I see is second to none. None of the other schools teachers care about teaching you how to become a better member of society like Central.
Today kids in general need centimentality in their life and that is what Central is. Been through so much and is still standing. If it goes, there will be no more middle schools in Plymouth besides West, and only Allen Smith, and Byrd elementary schools with the future closure of Farrand.
Not to mention it will be good for no one with the future high class sizes with the closure of Central. Where will the teachers at Central go?
Central is an important part of our community in Plymouth and something most young people and Canton people don't and won't understand.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen

12:51 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Evan, I can not Agree more! The education at Central is outstanding and the teachers are amazing. Sure they could split them up and ship them to other buildings but the teamwork they have acquired in that building is beyond compare. The Counselors and teachers work closely with each other to maintain the best balance for each student. It is a rare quality that most schools do not possess!

Paul Schulz

10:06 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

@ P: Central could easily be retrofitted with a simple and efficient heating and cooling system. Although many generations have attended school there and turned out just fine. Lets not get our standards to high. You make it sound like Central is similar to one of Detroit's bombed out schools.... Its not! Its needs a little TLC, thats all! Its not the look of the building, the old design, or the imperfections that educate our children. Its the teachers inside.... In fact in my opinion the location of that school is perfect, in that it offers our children the opportunity to be apart of the robust community that surrounds it. That school is beneficial to future generations of Plymouth residents. If just for the children who grow up around her. Central is special, although to many who don't understand the dynamics of our small town. its not understood. There is a movement out there that is downsizing our school system, consolidating schools, and uprooting children and busing them to foreign lands. Along with that comes diversity, and in many ways that has been destructive. There is a downside to diversity. I have heard from a great number of Mothers and Fathers here that would like there children to be apart of a smaller system, a Plymouth System. I think its time that our taxpayers begin discussing protecting our future as a community. It may be time to merge the City and TWP. Having one Police and Fire department and our own School system. Lets protect our Community.

Reply

Rob in CANTON

4:32 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

@ Paul Schulz: "Protect our community." You are a racist. I have news for you: your zip code does not make you better than anyone else, so stop thinking that you are. Why don't you just spell out to the people what you think the "downside" to diversity is? Perhaps Central is a special landmark, but it is not because of your "robust community" or "heritage." These are merely racist codewords for "white." You should move to Howell. I hear they don the white sheets pretty freely out there.

Reply

Paul Schulz

6:40 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

@ Rob in CANTON: The Plymouth community is, and has always been open to everyone. There is no racism here whatsoever. At least I have never heard of even an incident. Is it wrong to speak up, and voice my opinion? I was not in any way racist. I refer to "protecting my community", as maintaining the highest quality of life. I have stated, and will state again, that a community that is intact, similar to the old days, had its own systems, a simple government, efficient and small. A community police, and fire department. Its own school system. This traditional version, is a true community. It enables a more controlled environment, to ensure a higher standard. An independent system free from consolidation, that provides the best management, and oversight, to ensure its taxpayers the value, safety, and services afforded them. I am not racist Rob in Canton, come and live in our community, you are more than welcome to. Its a great place to live.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob in CANTON

8:23 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

You failed to address the one thing I asked you to: What is the "downside" of diversity? See if you can parse your words even further to avoid looking like the racist that you are.

Comment_arrow

Boiling

10:03 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Paul, don’t get caught up in Rob’s race baiting comments! Your post is honest and describes many thoughts that are shared by other readers. I’ll address the “downside” to institutionalize “Diversity”. Drawing attention to diversity is counter effective. By celebrating our differences, we are really just pushing ourselves away from each other and focusing not on the person’s worth that is in front of us, but on the ideas and opinions they have that are different from ours. While that does sometimes offer a different perspective, it often just creates boundaries that discourage solidarity.

Based on interviews with almost 30,000 people in the U.S., Robert Putnam, professor of public policy at Harvard, has found that diversity in a community has its downsides.
Diversity is proportional to:
less voting,
less volunteering,
less giving to charity,
less working on community projects,
less trusting of one's neighbors, and
less civic well-being.

Comment_arrow

P

9:55 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Paul, I think the problem is that you used "ghetto like" and "downside to diversity" in the same paragraph. I actually took you very eloquently put ideas the same way that Rob did.

John

9:42 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Several people have commented that Central should be saved, in part, because there are great teachers there. You do understand that they let the teachers leave before they bulldoze the building, right? There are great teachers there, despite the rundown facility. Could you imagine how they will thrive in a school that is up to date? There is nothing wrong with admitting that a building is no longer fit to serve its purpose anymore - the district didn't so anything wrong, the staff didn't do anything wrong, the students didn't do anything wrong - it is just a fact of life.

To address those that are saying our student are being shipped out of town to school, you do know that there are two middle schools within a mile of Central, right? We are not talking about Michigan Ave and Beck Rd, East is about a mile away and West is maybe 3/4 of a mile away. Maybe Canton is the one getting shafted on Middle Schools? Two in the City of Plymouth, two in Plymouth Twp and one in Canton.

To address the issue of creating our own district for just Plymouth...c'mon...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen

1:01 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

john- You obviously do not understand the inner workings of Central Middle School and the way that these teachers team with each other and have learned to work with each other. You can split them up and send them to different places but then you have broken up a team that has learned to work exceptionally and disbanded it. A tire is not as effective at getting someplace unless you have a bike or car to put it on. It is the WHOLE of the parts that makes Central as exceptional as it is.

There are a few other middle schools in town but they are pretty full. Many of the students will be bussed to schools in Canton. A neighborhood school encourages a community to form and be established among the kids. It is a more stable environment to have a smaller school with most everyone knowing everyone else.

Comment_arrow

John

2:53 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

It is a little offensive if you think the teachers can't adapt to working with new co-workers or the same co-workers but in a different building.

Comment_arrow

Jen

4:03 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

John- Again, you are not really getting the idea of teamwork and having a good team like relationship. Sure they could get the hang of working with other people, just like I could most likely do a decent job being a wife for someone other than the man I married. would it be as good? would we have just as good of a team? Most likely not! Finding just the right blend of people is not as easy as it sounds.

Comment_arrow

DownUpside1

7:13 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

@Jen - out of the 5 middle schools in the district, only 1 (Discovery) is in Canton. I think it is very, very, extremely unlikely that students in the area currently zoned to Central would by-pass East, West and Pioneer in order to be bussed to the southernmost middle school which happens to be in Canton.

Comment_arrow

Jen

7:42 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

@DownUpside1- Ok, so not Canton but still not IN Plymouth either. they are all on the outskirts of town AND much further away than Central is to their residence now. Two of those that you mentioned are on the cusp of Canton/Plymouth twp.

Comment_arrow

DownUpside1

8:03 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

So then what is the proposition of middle school to close? The study done last year show an annual decline, county-wide, in the birth rate since the early 2000's. And then subtract the students who have migrated to the charter schools who will not likely come back for middle school. Very soon, those lower student population numbers are going to work their way into the middle schools. At some point, it will likely be decided to close a school to right-size to fill classes. If the argument is to keep Central open, no matter how dilapadated, in order to have a middle school in the heart of DTP, then which middle school do you suggest closing when the population shifts hits.

Comment_arrow

Jen

8:09 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I am counting on a rebound of the economy which will in turn re-energize our youthful population. The mass numbers of people moving out of State when the economy tanked is what dropped the numbers. I don't think that it is wise to close ANY of the schools just yet and Central can be updated, it does not need to be destroyed.

Comment_arrow

DownUpside1

8:33 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I'm not going to even try to logically debate vs. the belief that the economy will come back within the next few (like 2) years enough to feed hundreds of new students into the PCCS district. Not to mention the belief that the voters will approve a bond to update Central (bond that hasn't passed on previous ballots).

Being optimistic is admirable, but to not be willing to look at the situation realistically shows a lack of problem solving.

Annie

10:30 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I'm not saying we should save Central. As school buildings go, I believe that it is an antiquated heap. If the physical space interferes with the students ability to learn then it's time to move on. Let it go. It's not the White House for God's sake. My concern is that as a Plymouth resident there has not been one new school built in my city to serve my children. Instead, my kids have to get on a bus to go miles away into another city that has new buildings simply because that city has seen growth in population. I love Plymouth and think it is a great viable city. I have lived most of my adult life here. The one thing that keeps me from giving Plymouth a "10" is that we share a school district with Canton. Sorry, my Canton neighbors but it's just my opinion. I know a lot of families in Plymouth that feel the same way. They bought in the community years ago just hearing that the schools were good and since things have changed both in the Canton community as well as the school district they are now feeling less than satisfied but since their kids are too entrenched in their schools/friends feel unable to move. Me, I'm putting my house up for sale in the spring and heading to Northville. I actually like the Plymouth community better than Northville believe it or not. I love my downtown, love my neighbors, my parks, library, city services, etc. I am moving simply because of the schools. Plain and simple. Plymouth could be even better than Northville if we had our own schools.

Reply

DownUpside1

12:21 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I believe that bond proposals made in the past to update Central were defeated by the voters. I don't want to send my kids to a school that is in such bad shape.

And for those worried about overcrowding other schools and the teachers at Central who would be let go...did you all miss the study done last year that showed that the birth rate in Wayne County has been in a decline since the early 2000's? One of the reasons (not the only one) that the elementary schools have less kids enrolled is that it is impossible to enroll children who were never born. Last year's report clearly shows that this population shift was only a few years away from being noticeable in the PCCS middle schools. I knew then that the discussion of closing a middle school was on the horizon.

Reply

DG

2:35 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

The real problem is this district it just to big to manage effectively with a board of elected officials who all march to the beat of a different drummer. They all want something different, they all ask for something different and the administration and staff is forced to spend countless wasted hours following up every hair brained scheme the board members throw at them. In the end despite all data, reasoning and common sense we will get another politically diluted do nothing vote just like last year.

The board failed to address problems at the elementary level. Now they pretend like that has been fixed and are moving on the their next failure at the middle school level. If they want equity at all the schools then they should close Central and utilize the double wide trailers for the remaining Middle schools to deal with over crowding. That's what we got for a fix last year.

*reposted with corrections*

Reply

thinkscience

12:11 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

Why is it that all the downtown plymouth-ite's talk about not wanting to close this building yet fight tooth and nail to make sure the boundaries are drawn so their kids go to west instead of central? Why is it that the boundaries are drawn so that this school, in the heart of a wealthy city with few miniorities has the largest percentage of minority and free/reduced lunch students. If it's so great, then send your kids there, but we all know that won't happen.
The FACT is this school cannot be renovated to have anywhere near the equity of the other middle schools. Study after study over the past decade has shown this. Teachers in the building are successful in spite of, not because of, the building they work in and if you ask any teacher in that building they will tell you they WANT it closed. I like historic buildings as much as the next person but schools need to be places where learning can occur without unneeded impairment.

Reply

DG

8:29 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

The FACT is Central has more acreage, more SQ footage and more amenities than any other middle school. Tennis courts, A track, full soccer field, full football field and a pool and sits in the heart of the most densely populated area in the district. It has more potential than any other middle school in the district ... if it was properly renovated, maintained and managed.

I agree the districting is horrible, the boundary for the school should include the entire City of Plymouth. I, as a "Plymouth-ite", would be happy to send my kids there rather and West if they would fix the place and do a proper redistricting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

P

6:51 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

That's right. You said the word. IF IF IF IF IF...they would fix the place, you would let your kids go there, but not in it's current condition. So even you agree that it is not currently good enough for your own children. Yet you live soooo close to it. If you love the school soooo much, put in a request for your kids to go there. I am sure the board of education would grant the request.

Paul Schulz

1:00 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

There are some things that you just don't change. Central is located there by our forefathers for a specific reason. To provide a school of higher learning for the "Plymouth Community". No need for buses, kids could walk, in the safety and security of the Plymouth sidewalks. Neighbors get to know the kids, as well as the shop owners, which offers the community interaction. Students may be declining now, but there is a greater demand today in residential housing in small communities, where neighborhood schools are preferred, for the reasons heard here. The dynamics are the same from many years ago. There is a great respect for a simpler way, an old fashioned way, and Plymouth, especially downtown offers that. I think it would be great to isolate ourselves from our neighboring communities, and protect our way of life. The leaders in our public schools, as well as in our local governments are destroying our community. Lets get out of Canton, we could support our own system, and our children could have a much better education, free from the new generic model. I saw it happen in Livonia when I was an elementary student, when they started closing neighborhood schools. Its destroyed entire neighborhoods, lifelong multi - generational relationships, and forced diversity, in which there is a downside, upon our children. I am 40 now, and its happening in our community. Its pretty simple to me, liberalism is a mental disorder. One police, One fire dept. and our own school system.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CMD

9:23 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Paul, there are some things you just don't change, and Central Middle School is NOT one of them. You mention no need for busses??? have you been there recently? Kids in Canton as far away as Ford and Haggerty are bussed there. Kids are taking long bus rides to go to a school that is dirty, drab, and hot. The staff may be wonderful, but I know many also do not like their working conditions. I am not a liberal , but I think sending kids to place that distracts from learning is not a good idea. Having cockroaches in cafeteria and classrooms is not a good idea. Sweating and being miserable while trying to concentrate on a test is not a good idea. Stop being so poetic and nostalgic about this....be sensible. It is ugly inside and out and not a good learning environment.

Comment_arrow

P

6:47 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Oh sure, centrally located alright. My kid has to walk across at the signal of a busy street, down the road, across the railroad tracks, by lunatic speeding drivers to get to the dump. Close it. At least then he can catch a bus.

Lowell Alum

3:46 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Closing Central is long overdue. As others have pointed out, it is really old and in poor shape compared to the other buildings. This will also allow the middle school boundaries to be redrawn much more sensibly so more Canton Township kids can attend Discovery. I always disliked the fact that the vast majority of the district's population comes from Canton but 4 out of 5 middle schools are in Plymouth.

One more thing - Central was recently given a "C" by the Michigan Department of Education, which is the lowest rating for any school in the district. Apparently it isn't as good as many of the commenters here would have us believe.

Reply

Paul Schulz

11:03 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I have a question, perhaps someone here could provide me the information. How many students within the Plymouth-Canton school district come from the Plymouth Community? How many in High School, Middle, and Elementary? Does anyone know those numbers? I would like to know....

Reply

Paul Schulz

11:19 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

@ P: You should complain to the School Board, why there isan't a crossing guard where you child crosses. That is unacceptable! P, thats a weak argument about Central, kids all over the community walk to school crossing streets where drivers speed. I suggest you talk with the Police department and inform them about issues of speeding in School zones, that you have witnessed. They will patrol it. In front of our offices there is a crosswalk for kids, with a crossing guard. Plymouth has also started program using real speed signs throughout the community. They are currently being rotated from location to location. I think they should be permanently installed where there are speeding issues. I watched them on our security cams, and when people see the blinking speed at which they are traveling, they immediately slow down. Maybe at the next City Commissions leadership should be reminded, for such a small investment, a dozen or so of those speed signs could be purchased and permanently installed for the safety of everyone. Has anyone noticed the new signs, actually they have been moving around for about 6 months.

Reply

dswan

9:53 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

How is it the district just last year recommended closing three elementary schools and is now asking for additions to the four remaining middle schools? Meanwhile, charter schools are siphoning more and more K-8 graders away from traditional schools. If Central needs to go, the district ought to consider changing the grade/building configuration before looking to add to their overhead amid a dwindling population of students. Let's see the district's Count Day results before we make a decision. It's unfortunate the technology and bus upgrades are tied to the middle school expansion; they would have a better chance of getting passed if presented separately.

Reply

DownUpside1

3:00 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

@dswan - one of the recommended proposals last year did include the closure of a middle school. It was arguably the proposition that entailed the most change since it redistributed population across the board for grades 1-8. That was a bigger bite than the board was willing to chew last year so they quickly decided to only talk about the elementary schools.

Unfortunately, instead of making the hard choices for the district as a whole, residents are forced to suffer through piece-meal attempts at restructuring based on population in or condition of a particular building.

Reply

dswan

5:37 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

The board really kicked the can down the road by only closing one elementary school. Had it committed to a macro level change, millions in operating expeses could have been saved, elementary schools feeding multiple middle schools could have been corrected, and future incremental changes could have been avoided. Instead, the board caved when the families affected by more closings made their case. The Observer reported that by 2017, it's expected that the district's middle school population will decrease by 600-900 from today's levels. If that's the case, there is no reason to expand the current middle schools or build a new one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeosika

5:57 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

So for the next 5 years the children who attend Central are to continue with the status quo.......where is the school equity in that?

Comment_arrow

Lowell Alum

3:36 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

You're right about delining student populations. The spring 2012 count showed 1,393 5th graders, 1,348 4th graders, 1,337 3rd graders, 1,273 2nd graders, 1,198 1st graders, and only 1,073 Kindergardeners. The elementary schools will see a large drop in the fall 2012 counts and the middle schools are only a few years away from experiencing the same. Looking at these numbers there is no reason to spend money to expand building size.

Comment_arrow

dswan

11:01 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

Jeosika, If the district must close Central now; they have alternatives other than adding classrooms that will only be used for 5 years. Given that there's excess K-5 capacity; one option is to move 6th grade back to the elementary schools. The district ought to look at the demographic trends and come up with a long term plan.

Paul Schulz

7:57 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

How many students who attend the Plymouth-Canton school district are from the Plymouth community. How many in High School, middle and elementary. The answers to those questions could be very helpful. With those numbers I could easily evaluate whether it would be more practical to break Plymouth off into its own small district. If the system is shrinking in enrollment, perhaps it would be beneficial to the students. Canton should have its own system, it once needed us, it no longer does. We could have an elite system of our own, with smaller class sizes, and nothing short of excellence.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lowell Alum

3:22 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

I would like to know this data too but it is hard to find it. We can make rough estimates though. Since 9 out of 15 elementary schools have their entire attendence boundaries south of Joy Road and 4 others are partly south of Joy, I would guess that over 70% of the 18,000 kids in the district live in Canton Township or Superior Township. Less than 30% would be from the City of Plymouth, Plymouth Township, Northville Township, and Salem Township put together. In other words, if the areas north of Joy Road were its own district it would be smaller than Van Buren Public Schools, which is only large enough for one high school, one 7-8 middle school, one 5-6 upper elementary, and four K-4 elementaries.

Darken

10:47 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

I have lived in Plymouth my entire life. Central was Plymouth HIGH SCHOOL long before it was rededicated as a middle school. This is WHY it has all those lovely amenities, like a football field, soccer fields, pool, etc. If you really are into the history of this town, try educating yourself on it's history.

Reply

TMNI

7:35 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

I couldn't be happier that they want to close Central. It was nasty 30 years ago when my husband when there. Now my daughter, a Kindergartener, would have to go there. The thought of her spending 8hrs a day 5 days a week for 3 years in that old moldy building makes me want to look into private schools (which with 3 kids wouldn't be easy). I'm sure there is plenty that can be done with the building it someone wants to pour the money into it but, it really is an eye sore. My husband and I are lifelong plymouth residents. I understand the need for historical buildings. The Penn is great! I love going to a movIe there but, I'm not required to spend 40+ hrs a week there either. There are MANY beautiful buildings in Plymouth worth fighting for, Central Middle School just isn't one of them.

Reply

Jackson Wilson III

12:43 am on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Central is a great school.Period. If we can afford to add on to other schools, take that money, put in individual heating and cooling units in each room.presto, magico, DONE. Dealing with the heat was minimal,only a few days a year....NEVER heard ANY complaints about it being cold there.NEVER...Teachers and staff, and PTO there was pretty darn good.

Reply

Quack Quack

12:08 am on Monday, March 18, 2013

I am currently at Central and I wouldn't have it any other way! Shout out to Mrs. Taylor and Mrs. VanderWal in the library for being freakin amazing! Mr. Ballard, Mr. Dinan, Ms. Eagles and Ms. Medley are the BEST coaches ever. Mr. Ruela and Mr. Hunter have the administration right. Coach LaPointe is the ultimate P.E. teacher. Huge shout out to Ms. Smith, Mr. Helmes, Mr. Calzone and Mr. Jadallah for doing bus duty EVERY day. NJHS would not exist without Mrs. Stephens, Mrs. Stop, Mrs. Mollick, Ms. Wells and Mrs. Boyd. Our morning announcements are hilarious on staff members birthdays thanks to Mr. Boyd. Plus 7th hour, WEB leaders and so many more clubs.
PCCS world not be PCCS without central

Reply

Quack Quack

2:34 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

derp Mrs. Anderson is on NJHS as well sorry Mrs. A

Reply

Leave a comment