Township Trustees Should Reconsider Move To Sever Ties With City Of Plymouth

Just because it's carved in stone, doesn't mean you can't re-carve that stone. This was one of the first, and most important lessons I learned when I became a trustee on the Clarenceville Board of Education. Another lesson that I very quickly learned, was that if you are wrong, the best course of action is to admit the error, and take corrective measures.

Shortly after I was elected to the school board, I was faced with a vote on an emotional issue involving our ability to continue to have a gymnastics team. I cast my vote based on emotion, rather than on reality. I went home feeling really good about myself, as I was on the right side of the vote.

The following week when Gary, my board mentor, came back from vacation, we had a really contentious conversation about the issue. Cuss words were spoken, furniture was broken, and we parted ways in disagreement. That night in bed, when I do some of my most honest and sincere thinking, I came to the conclusion that my fellow board member was right, and that I was wrong. As much as I hated it, and as big a blow to my ego as it was, I knew I had gotten this vote wrong.

Swallowing my pride, I called him the next day, and I admitted my feelings, and asked what could be done. This is where I learned how good of a friend and mentor that I had. Gary never rubbed my nose in it. He simply said that it sucks to have to make some of these decisions, and that I was gonna do just fine. He said that if I was losing sleep over a decision, I would be the kind of board member that could be counted on to make good decisions.

He also taught me another valuable lesson. He said that just because we carved that policy in stone, did not prevent us from re-carving that stone if it was in the best interests of our school district. At the very next meeting, I took responsibility for my wrong decision, by bringing this issue to the table for reconsideration. It was not a fun thing to have to do for a new member, but it was the right thing to do, and in the end, we got the policy right, and I gained a little respect from my fellow board members. The most uncomfortable lessons, seem to always pay the most long term dividends it seems.

This brings me to the Plymouth Township Board of Trustees in general, and Supervisor Richard Reaume, and Clerk Nancy Conzelman in particular.

Recently, the Board of Trustees voted by a 4-3 tally, to prohibit Plymouth Township from entering into any authority type of agreements with the City of Plymouth. This motion was made by an angry Ron Edwards, it was made by a man who has a beef with a couple of people in the city. It was not thought out, and was not even on the agenda for consideration. It was a spur of the moment motion made by an angry man, hell bent on revenge.

I am picking out Conzelman for the spotlight, because she is the newest member of the board, and has the least amount of experience. She voted in favor of Edwards motion, and in my opinion, she had the incorrect vote, on an emotional issue. I have been there, and done that, as I expressed earlier.

It is at this point that Supervisor Reaume would be wise to exert his leadership and experience, and have a mentoring session with his inexperienced clerk. His time would obviously be wasted on Edwards, as you can't easily change the person whose personality is so deeply rooted in confrontation, and anger. He could not easily persuade Kay Arnold either, as she is a stone on this board, and will not be willing to swallow enough of her pride to admit she was wrong on an issue. I think Mike Kelly could have another look at this with an open mind, but it would be much easier to try to persuade Conzelman, and hope that her ego will not be a deterrent to reversing an incredibly silly policy.

Mr. Reaume is a smart guy. He knows that you do not blow up bridges with folks you may have to do business with on another day. Nobody can predict what kinds of things that the township will want to be involved with in the future, that would be in the city of Plymouth, and he voted to keep this door open.

In my experience on the school board, I was a Republican surrounded by, for the most part Democrats. I learned very quickly that you have to put personalities aside, put ideologies aside, and do the job that the people elected you to do. You have to find ways to coexist with folks that you might not go out for a beer and a burger with, so to speak.

The Plymouth Township residents don't give a rats patoot whether Ron Edwards has grudges with somebody in the city. They don't care about these things. They want their elected officials to do their jobs, and put political, and personal issues aside. Mr. Doroshewitz, Mr. Curmi, and Mr. Reaume, correctly understand this, and they wanted nothing to do with Edward's motion.

I actually found something very interesting and unfortunately ironic about what transpired at the January Board of Trustees meeting. While Ron Edwards was stating that he wanted nothing to do with the City of Plymouth, and while me made a motion that was passed, to remove any chance of the township and the city doing business for the rest of his term, there was a calender hanging on my refrigerator.

The calender hanging on my fridge was produced and mailed out to every Plymouth Township resident by this Board of Trustees. On this calender were points of pride that this Board of Trustees chose to highlight. They used each month as a different point of pride, to show residents how nice it is to live in Plymouth Township.

The page that my calender was turned to was obviously January. The picture? The Plymouth Ice Festival. Where is the Plymouth Ice Festival? Well, it's in the City of Plymouth.

How terribly ironic that on the night that this Board of Trustees voted to basically divorce itself from the City of Plymouth, their own calender was using the city to brag about how good the township is. If you go to the November page, the City of Plymouth is also displayed, and a picture with Central Middle School, home of the proposed PARC project can be seen as well. Terribly ironic.

The bottom line is that these two great communities are indeed one. We are one Plymouth in the eyes of our residents. That is how it is, and that is how it should always be. If the folks in our communities feel that way, it is the responsibility of our elected officials to act in a manner that reflects the views and wishes of these people. The City of Plymouth elected officials have done just that, and that is a good thing. The job now, as I see it, is for the elected officials in Plymouth Township to act in kind, and reverse this incredibly irresponsible decision.

If Supervisor Reaume truly believes he had the right vote, he will bring this issue back to the Board of Trustees for further consideration. He will also approach Clerk Conzelman and have a discussion with her.

A heart to heart talk between Reaume and Conzelman could go a long way in correcting this mess. He could remind her that it is unwise to burn bridges with folks that you may need to do business with in the future. He could remind her that a majority of the folks who are now angry, actually voted for her, and will most certainly be voting in the next election as well. He could then tell her that any policy that may seem to be carved in stone, can be changed just as soon as they decide to re-carve that particular stone.

There is no shame in admitting that you may have gotten a vote wrong, and then taking steps to correct it. The shame comes if you allow pride and ego to get in the way of what is best for your community...

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Rich Childs February 19, 2014 at 05:57 PM
Bryan, I appreciate your comments about the recent vote, however would like to add a note here. It was the City of Plymouth that opted to pull out of a long standing arrangement with some combined Public Safety services. AT the time that this occurred their were unfunded legacy costs associated with the arrangement . When I asked the question at a public forum, whether the City was going to fund their share of the legacy costs, the reply was that this one of the unresolved issues around the "divorce". I don't know at this time whether that issue has been resolved, however if it is still unresolved, one can understand why Mr. Edwards, as the Treasurer, with a very clear knowledge of the costs involved, would not be interested in any future shared services. Having said this, I concur with your belief that we should always keep the door open for creative options that benefit the community at large. Clearly when people talk about Plymouth in general, they seldom differentiate between the two legal entities, while enjoying the great benefits of living here.
Tom Marunich February 20, 2014 at 11:58 AM
Just because the City of Plymouth was in error (IMHO)by opting out of the combined Public Safety services agreement does that mean Plymouth Township should opt out of all future shared services? Two wrongs do not make a right. As a Township resident when people from elsewhere ask where I live I state "Plymouth, Michigan". Let's work together elected officials for the good of the people and not your personal agenda.
Stacey Mundt February 20, 2014 at 05:04 PM
I live in Plymouth, Michigan and am very blessed to be here. I'm lucky. Being a wife, mom and step-mom, I'm a part of a small community of families who take advantage of what Plymouth has to offer. Unfortunately, as far as the PARC project, I must go outside of my community and pay another city to use their recreational facility at such a high cost that it's not affordable. I'm not affiliated with any political party. In fact, most of what I read and hear has an unfortunate similarity to what happens on an elementary school playground. Children don't make government decisions, so why do some adults act in such manner? I'll admit that I'm naive in the circus of city government, but I do believe that my voice should be heard. Yes, it's a vision of Utopia, but personal differences need to be set aside for the benefit of all who call Plymouth, Michigan home. I encourage the Township and the City to continue working towards common ground and applaud you for your mature efforts.
Jane Q. Viewer February 20, 2014 at 10:30 PM
How can we fix the obviously contentious relationship between the city and township?
Bryan Bentley (Editor) February 21, 2014 at 11:04 PM
There is no easy answer to that question Jane. The best way I know how, is for folks to take some time and call the Township Supervisor, and express your views, as well as expressing them at a Board of Trustees meeting. The problem though, is that they just don't seem to care what constituents think or say. They hunker down at these meetings, and wait for folks to vent, and then move on as if nothing was ever said. It's an amazing thing to actually see in person. I have also seen Treasurer Edwards verbally attack residents for sharing their views, and that is really ugly and unfortunate behavior. He actually yelled at a senior citizen after the last meeting, right in front of roughly 20 other residents. It is this behavior that leads me to believe that there is not much to be done, other than to wait until their terms end, and elect more quality officials.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something