.

Plymouth-Canton to Weigh District Realignment Options

Options include closing various elementary, middle schools.

’ Board of Education soon will be faced with a decision on which district buildings to close in order to get the most from the district’s sizable real estate.

Plante Moran CRESA, a real estate consulting firm commissioned by the district, presented several scenarios Thursday to the board and a mostly full auditorium that present the best places to put the district’s 18,155 students.

The plans, Plante Moran CRESA partner Paul Willis said, all would save the district money and eliminate unused space in existing buildings, helping the district meet the state’s goal of 85 percent utilization, but each have drastically different ways in doing so.

According to Willis’ presentation, the district’s elementary buildings are the most poorly utilized, with just 78 percent of their classroom space being used. Grades 6-8 are 96 percent utilized, and Plymouth-Canton Educational Park is 100 percent utilized.

Scenario 1A

The first scenario presented by Plante Moran CRESA maintains the elementary buildings’ K-5 configuration and would utilize 90 percent of available facilities, but would close , and elementaries and relocate Tanger Center, a special-education facility, and , the district’s alternative high school. This would save the district between $2.465-$2.605 million.

This plan, Willis said, “right-sizes” the number of facilities at elementary level based on five-year enrollment projections, reduces transportation costs and maintains a maximum one-mile walking distance for most students to nearby elementary schools.

In closing , ’s services could move to that building, allowing up to 400 more students to utilize its program. This could carry an added cost, however, as ’s science labs would have to be renovated to meet high school requirements. An unused — a building in Plymouth's Old Village that is showing its age — would cost $186,000 yearly to maintain, Willis said.

The plans submitted by Plante Moran CRESA did not indicate where Tanger Center's programming would be moved.

Scenario 1B

A second scenario also would maintain the current K-5 format at the elementary schools, meets 85 percent utilization and closes just two elementary schools — and — while relocating Tanger and .

This plan would save the district between $1.68-$1.93 million.

This plan, Willis said, impacts the least number of elementary students. Given ’s location near the center of the district, it offers the opportunity to expand existing programs or offer new programs at the site, including early childhood programs.

Willis recommended the district adopt either Scenario 1A or 1B.

Scenario 2A

A third plan would reconfigure grade levels at the elementary buildings to K-6, meet 85 percent utilization and close and elementaries and , while relocating Tanger and .

This plan would save the district between $3.415 million and $3.645 million.

, , , and elementaries would remain K-5 in the in the short term, and would require significant improvements, such as improved heating and cooling capacities, to be on par with the district’s other middle schools.

Scenario 2B

A fourth plan also would reconfigure elementary buildings to a K-6 format for 85 percent utilization of facilities and would close and elementaries, and relocate Tanger and .

This plan would save the district between $3.52-$3.545 million, but would require the same improvements to as Scenario 2A and keep five of the district’s elementary buildings in the K-5 format.

Scenario 3

A fifth plan would provide a pre-kindergarten program and reconfigure elementary schools to upper- and lower- level formats and close Fiegel and Hulsing elementary schools. Tanger Center and would be relocated.

This plan would save the district between $2.15-$2.27 million.

Under Scenario 3, the district would essentially create “sister schools” with each lower- and upper-level school pairing, Willis said. This would, for instance, have students begin at for lower-level instruction before moving up to for upper-level grades. The district’s elementary districting map would reflect these pairings for deciding which schools students attend.

This plan, Willis said, would take longer to integrate than the other four.

Parents want to learn more

Community input was tame, but inquisitive after Willis’ presentation. Many parents retreated to the hallways, where maps of the proposed elementary districting were on display (and are viewable online within Plante Moran CRESA’s presentation), but some expressed concerns about some of the district’s pending moves.

Canton resident Donna Brazil said she wanted to know what considerations were made regarding adult-aged special education students, whose education is funded by the state until through 26 years of age.

Jennifer Millen of Plymouth said she was worried about already-busy traffic around , which is situated near a neighborhood, increasing if the building accommodates additional early childhood programs.

Board member Judy Mardigian suggested closing , often criticized for its aging facilities and lack of sufficient air conditioning, moving it to .

More opportunities for community input

Parents will be able to weigh in on the district’s realignment plans at any of the following community forums:

  • Feb. 7, 6:30 p.m.,
  • Feb. 27, 6:30 p.m., Discovery Middle School
  • March 6, 6:30 p.m., Discovery Middle School

The board is expected to make its final decision regarding realignment plans during a board meeting at 7 p.m. on March 27.

greg anderson February 04, 2012 at 02:45 AM
The board must vote for the best LONG TERM solution and which will effect the least number of elementary children.
Mary Uhl February 04, 2012 at 01:45 PM
Not hearing the discussions and reasoning behind recommendations, but I can't imagine closing East over Central? If it's the pool and gym they could be maintained. Just a thought.
A hudak February 04, 2012 at 02:43 PM
The board must also remember that students that attend Starkweather currently, will need transportation at their new location. We cannot leave these high risk students out in the cold again. They deserve a good education with no barriers as many of their parents struggle to work and get them to school at the same time.
Jerry Grady February 04, 2012 at 04:34 PM
I believe the right process is being done all around. Hiring an outside firm who went through the tedious issue of taking into account transportation costs, demographics, demographics five years out, displacement of children, and costs of remolding, was the best thing that could be done. Unfortunately at the end of the day many families are going to be effected by this. Based on the study, and the overall budgetary constraints, it is something which must be done. I for one would not want to be like Livonia was a few years ago with many empty buildings and no plans for them. This way plans can be made and assets can be sold to get the most value out of them for the budget if and only if there is no viable use for education of the children. One item that I do not believe was taken into account was the decrease in value of homes based on the displacement of the realignment.
Susan Miller February 07, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Although I was unable to attend the meeting, I did read the report posted on the district's website. I was dismayed to learn that when considering the various scenarios, that a certain population of our students was "excluded" from the plan - namely, the Special Education students. It seems as if their placement will be an afterthought in this plan, depending simply on where there is room. These changes are difficult at best for the parents and students in the general education setting, but at least your needs are being considered.
Maddiex February 07, 2012 at 08:39 PM
I was looking at the voting results above and I see the #1 answer is more people support scenario 2B, but I wonder if they realize it means 6 graders would have to stay at the elementary buildings...
frank February 07, 2012 at 11:30 PM
Or if they realize that 5 elementary schools would stay K-5. Why do some schools get treated differently from the rest? If one school goes K-6 then they ALL do. End of story.
Maddiex February 08, 2012 at 01:07 PM
I think the ones they say will stay K-5 are the ones that are full or over capacity now. They have to provide twice the space for kindergarten now because of full-day kindergarten, and those building wouldn't have the space. The kids at those schools shouldn't have to have bigger class sizes to accomodate. Lowering class sizes is a big concern.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »